The Rise of the Artemis Accords, The Decline of the Moon Treaty

Want space insights like these in your inbox? Subscribe for weekly analysis.

If only all introductions were as short as my last one!

In that spirit, I invite you to visit Astralytical’s newly designed website.

The new emphasis is on our data-based space insights and the growing importance of the lunar and cislunar operations, commercial space stations, and spaceport development.

As we enter the new year, Astralytical turns 8 years old. I appreciate the support of our clients and partners and I’m so proud of the team for our growth this past year.

All the best,

Laura Forczyk, Executive Director


The Rise of the Artemis Accords, The Decline of the Moon Treaty

Artemis Accords (2020)

  • Multilateral agreements

  • Led by the US

  • 33 signatories

  • Angola is the latest signatory, joining on Nov. 30

The signatories of the Artemis Accords include:

  • Angola

  • Argentina

  • Australia

  • Bahrain

  • Brazil

  • Bulgaria

  • Canada

  • Colombia

  • Czech Republic

  • Ecuador

  • France

  • Germany

  • Iceland

  • India

  • Israel

  • Italy

  • Japan

  • Luxembourg

  • Mexico

  • Netherlands

  • New Zealand

  • Nigeria

  • Poland

  • South Korea

  • Romania

  • Rwanda

  • Saudi Arabia

  • Singapore

  • Spain

  • Ukraine

  • United Arab Emirates

  • United Kingdom

  • United States

  • Isle of Man

Moon Agreement (1979)

  • Formally known as Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies

  • 18 states are parties to the treaty

The parties (acceded and ratified or just acceded) to the Moon Agreement include:

  • Armenia

  • Australia

  • Austria

  • Belgium

  • Chile

  • Kazakhstan

  • Kuwait

  • Lebanon

  • Mexico

  • Morocco

  • Netherlands

  • Pakistan

  • Peru

  • Philippines

  • Saudi Arabia

  • Turkey

  • Uruguay

  • Venezuela

Space Resources

The Artemis Accords and the Moon Agreement are seen as a contradiction in the area of space resources.

The Moon Agreement states:

"As reflected in the provisions of this Agreement the Moon and its natural resources are the common heritage of mankind. The Moon is not subject to national appropriation by any claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means. Neither the surface nor the subsurface of the Moon, nor any part thereof or its natural resources, can become the property of any State, international intergovernmental or non-governmental organization, national organization or non-governmental entity, or of any natural person."

The Artemis Accords states:

“The Signatories emphasize that the extraction and utilization of space resources, including any recovery from the surface or subsurface of the Moon, Mars, comets, or asteroids, should be executed in a manner that complies with the Outer Space Treaty and in support of safe and sustainable space activities. The Signatories affirm that the extraction of space resources does not inherently constitute national appropriation under Article II of the Outer Space Treaty, and that contracts and other legal instruments relating to space resources should be consistent with that Treaty.”

  • Australia, Mexico, Netherlands, Saudi Arabia are parties to the Moon Agreement and the signatories of the Artemis Accords.

  • Saudi Arabia gave notice on January 5, 2023 to withdraw from the Moon Agreement on January 5, 2024.

  • Saudi Arabia has not given a reason for its withdraw.

Astralytical Analysis

  • The Moon Treaty will continue to lose its relevancy

  • The Artemis Accords will continue to gain momentum

  • The Artemis Accords will be seen as the modern space cooperative agreement after the Outer Space Treaty (1967)


Thank you for being part of the Astralytical community! If we can help you grow your business in space, please reach out. We’re happy to discuss your situation and goals.

Previous
Previous

US & Allies versus China & Allies to the Moon?

Next
Next

GAO Optimistic about Multiple Artemis Challenges